The man who was. Police opened fire He was sentenced to one year of surveillance last month after attacking several people at an Auckland supermarket. Owner of ISIS propaganda Which promoted terrorism.
The Crown Prince had tried to charge him under the Suppression of Terrorism Act but the request was rejected.
The man whose name is Pressure, Facing trial in Auckland High Court A jury found him guilty of two counts of having objectionable publications and failing to comply with a search.
In July, Justice Sally Fitzgerald sentenced him to 12 months in custody.
* One person was killed and six others were injured when police opened fire on Auckland’s Lin Mall Countdown.
* An Auckland man has been sentenced to 12 months in prison for ISIS propaganda material.
* Man is guilty of possessing ISIS propaganda material, but not of possessing a hunting knife.
* The jury heard
* A graphic video was played for the jury in the case of the accused who had ISIS propaganda.
He found that he had an “operative interest” in the terrorist organization, and one of the report’s authors concluded that he had “the means and motives for violence in the community.”
On Friday, a Sri Lankan man was shot dead by police as he stabbed several people at a countdown supermarket. Lynn Mall in West Auckland..
He was acquitted of a third charge during his trial earlier this year. Owner of another objectionable publication. – A video showing people being killed.
He was also acquitted of possessing a knife without legal authority.
The Crown Prince’s case was that Nasheed – slogans or hymns uttered by man – was “clearly designed” to influence the cause of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). And celebrate
One of the narcissists showed a picture of a person with a machine gun and an Isis flag, referring to violent acts with lyrics, including the death penalty and terrorism.
The second Nasheed explicitly encouraged terrorist attacks on countries of other faiths.
The author of the pre-sentence report concluded that the man supported ISIS’s goals and was at greater risk of re-defending and harming others.
Justice Fitzgerald said the risk factors included extreme human behavior, a sense of entitlement and an isolated lifestyle.
This person’s special conditions of surveillance mean that he was prohibited from having any electronic device accessible to the Internet other than a pre-approved device.
He also had to hand over his equipment and social media for probation and police checks.
Crown Prosecutor Henry Steele acknowledged that the man had been in custody for a long time and suggested that appropriate punishment was one of the strictest conditions.
“He has been a real concern for the Crown for many years, and those concerns remain.”
Steele said it was primarily offensive, and did not have access to rehabilitation.
At trial, Man took a stand in his defense. He claimed that he was only learning about his religion and was imprisoned because he was a Muslim.
Her Internet search history and bookmarks include: Islamic State dress, New Zealand prison clothes and food, improvised explosive devices, ISIS heroes, and a booklet issued by ISIS. I should avoid detecting it through Western security.
Defendant told the jury that his Internet searches were only checking what he had read in the news.
He also said that a search that included the keywords: “captive at the hands of God’s enemies”, was used only to check his spelling.
The man had previously been accused of having similar publications in 2017, and admitted to having limited content.